<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas A&amp;M &#8211; Engineering &#8211; Episode #37</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educheckup.com/2009/01/22/texas-am-engineering-episode-37/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educheckup.com/2009/01/22/texas-am-engineering-episode-37/</link>
	<description>Website reviews from your visitor’s point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:45:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Sackett</title>
		<link>http://educheckup.com/2009/01/22/texas-am-engineering-episode-37/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>George Sackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educheckup.com/?p=344#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice job Nick - I agree they have an impressive site. - Good job Matt -  We are looking at redesigning our homepage so will definitely look at the scrolling homepage idea . . . . There is always a fight for &quot;face time&quot; there and it is hard not to get too crowded when one stays in the smaller footprint. Not a bad compromise. Interested to learn where we might get some usability statistics regarding that kind of layout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job Nick &#8211; I agree they have an impressive site. &#8211; Good job Matt &#8211;  We are looking at redesigning our homepage so will definitely look at the scrolling homepage idea . . . . There is always a fight for &#8220;face time&#8221; there and it is hard not to get too crowded when one stays in the smaller footprint. Not a bad compromise. Interested to learn where we might get some usability statistics regarding that kind of layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
