http://educheckup.com/2009/10/16/university-of-the-cumberlands-episode-117/ Website reviews from your visitor’s point of view Sat, 12 May 2012 22:59:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://educheckup.com/2009/10/16/university-of-the-cumberlands-episode-117/comment-page-1/#comment-644 Nick DeNardis Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:53:54 +0000 http://educheckup.com/?p=982#comment-644 Yes. The fact that this site can be read by a screen reader is what gave them the additional points. The way UAT was setup there is no alternate text or way of getting at the information on the site. It would be just as if you pulled up Google.com and all you saw was a black screen with nothing on it. Everyone else is able to use it but you cannot see a thing or click on anything. That is how someone who is blind would see UAT, silence. Yes. The fact that this site can be read by a screen reader is what gave them the additional points. The way UAT was setup there is no alternate text or way of getting at the information on the site. It would be just as if you pulled up Google.com and all you saw was a black screen with nothing on it. Everyone else is able to use it but you cannot see a thing or click on anything. That is how someone who is blind would see UAT, silence.

]]> http://educheckup.com/2009/10/16/university-of-the-cumberlands-episode-117/comment-page-1/#comment-642 Scott Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:48:24 +0000 http://educheckup.com/?p=982#comment-642 Not that it really matters (an F is an F) but I think this site's code is as bad or worse than the code for the site in the previous episode. Did they get 20 additional points because their javascript kind of, sort of degraded ok? Not that it really matters (an F is an F) but I think this site’s code is as bad or worse than the code for the site in the previous episode. Did they get 20 additional points because their javascript kind of, sort of degraded ok?

]]>